Haha! I’ve been effected by Zach’s videos in the same way. I’m going to revamp my site too. I think it is a natural progression in a sense – you shoot more good stuff and then the stuff which is weaker goes out the door. Heck, I’d even like to ask him to critique my new site, if he still does this by the time I finish and if he’d choose to do so.

Mitchell, You have more guts than me. I think my skin is too thin. I might run away and cry like a baby.

Mitchell, You have more guts than me. I think my skin is too thin. I might run away and cry like a baby.

It’s a good idea! Spring-cleaning’s always good, I should do the same, and I also would like to ask for a critique, even if it seems suicidal…

I’m looking forward to the “new” galleries Matt. Feels good to go through and see things with fresh eyes sometimes.

I’m looking forward to the “new” galleries Matt. Feels good to go through and see things with fresh eyes sometimes.

This is exactly what I do too. But I don’t seem to clean enough. I need to get a bigger broom to do a good sweep. Can’t wait to see your house-cleaning and new galleries.

I’m glad that the critique of one photographer helps another.

Cheers,
Zack

I’m glad that the critique of one photographer helps another.

Cheers,
Zack

Matt – Perhaps you and Gavin and I can partner on this – we each do an edit for the two others. In other words you tell me which images you think I should lose are, and you tell Gavin the same thing. This way each of us gets two sets of eyes to do an edit/cull.

Let the thinning of the herd begin!

-d

I started a little of this myself this weekend. Not finished yet, but started looking at my images, presentation, and galleries more critically and did some sweeping up. It’s always helpful to have someone else look at your work and give you feedback, but next best is having someone else’s voice in your head

I started a little of this myself this weekend. Not finished yet, but started looking at my images, presentation, and galleries more critically and did some sweeping up. It’s always helpful to have someone else look at your work and give you feedback, but next best is having someone else’s voice in your head

Hey matt,
I alwas believed in this and my portfolio was limited to 10 or more images. I have recently re-refined my set and revamped the website again.

would love to see your best of the best.

I’m afraid that if I do this that I’ll end up with just my name and no photos! But perhaps that’s a good thing. Nothing like a completely empty portfolio to motivate one to get out and shoot.

I’m afraid that if I do this that I’ll end up with just my name and no photos! But perhaps that’s a good thing. Nothing like a completely empty portfolio to motivate one to get out and shoot.

I knew other must be in the same boat as me. Thanks Zack for making all this new work for us!

Watching the videos was like watching reality tv- I almost couldn’t bear to watch but couldn’t hit the stop button either…. compelling, palm-sweat inducing stuff. It is like watching a lecturer let rip through a uni assignment with a red pen (in my case there seemed always to be a lot more red pen than essay left!) BUT wholly necessary AND something that is invaluable to us all- the pro, the amateur, the newbie alike. I totally admire those just starting out who put their porfolios forward for Zach to critique (the girl who shot her first wedding springs to mind) and said “let me have it- don’t sugar coat, tell me exactly what you think- good, bad or ugly”. And sure, she (they) probably did have a little “oh god, that’s it, I am never picking up a camera again, I need a cup of tea and a long lie down” moment, but most importantly, she got constructive advice on how to move forward (and I am sure she did a happy dance when she was praised by Zach for consistently nailing exposure), what to work on. Because moving forward (not backwards, sideways,whatever) should be the goal for every photographer- whether you have been been shooting for 30 years or 5 years.

Interestingly, the photographic agency I occasionally work for (doing office work) regularly prunes, tweaks the portfolio’s (both online and hard copy) of their photographers in order to ensure that only their strongest work is on display. When an art director calls in the books of, say, 8 different photographers from 8 different agencies, you want to be darn sure that each and every photograph presented in the book is strong, and “counts”: because it may mean the difference between getting the commission…or not.

From what I have seen (and heard), I don’t think the importance of (tightly edited) “personal work” can be overstated. I know that one of the photographers from the agency (who started her photographic career at 37 and shoots mainly film- gives me hope!) gets a lot of work based on her personal portfolio…In fact each of the photographer’s has a “personal projects” section in their online portfolio.

Re editing: I always think it is so much easier to have someone else (on the same-ish wavelength of course) edit something than it is to do yourself. I guess this has something to do with the fact that the “editor” can be impartial,objective, ruthless, emotionless to some extent, because they don’t know what you went through to get the photograph ie lugging equipment, trekking in 35 degree heat all day without taking a single decent shot,getting chased by a pack of stray dogs etc – they only see the finished product. It is the same with correcting someone’s essay- easier to take the red pen to somebody’s work than your own.So even though it is excruiatingly hard to say “yep, here you go, here’s my portfolio- do your worst!” (and I don’t have the guts to do it- yet) I think it is easier than trying to do it yourself.

Sorry for banging on again (when I comment, I really like to comment a LOT, huh?!)……..So, once you, David and Gavin have culled, may I please have your “discards”…I think they would look mighty pretty in my portfolio ;);)

Watching the videos was like watching reality tv- I almost couldn’t bear to watch but couldn’t hit the stop button either…. compelling, palm-sweat inducing stuff. It is like watching a lecturer let rip through a uni assignment with a red pen (in my case there seemed always to be a lot more red pen than essay left!) BUT wholly necessary AND something that is invaluable to us all- the pro, the amateur, the newbie alike. I totally admire those just starting out who put their porfolios forward for Zach to critique (the girl who shot her first wedding springs to mind) and said “let me have it- don’t sugar coat, tell me exactly what you think- good, bad or ugly”. And sure, she (they) probably did have a little “oh god, that’s it, I am never picking up a camera again, I need a cup of tea and a long lie down” moment, but most importantly, she got constructive advice on how to move forward (and I am sure she did a happy dance when she was praised by Zach for consistently nailing exposure), what to work on. Because moving forward (not backwards, sideways,whatever) should be the goal for every photographer- whether you have been been shooting for 30 years or 5 years.

Interestingly, the photographic agency I occasionally work for (doing office work) regularly prunes, tweaks the portfolio’s (both online and hard copy) of their photographers in order to ensure that only their strongest work is on display. When an art director calls in the books of, say, 8 different photographers from 8 different agencies, you want to be darn sure that each and every photograph presented in the book is strong, and “counts”: because it may mean the difference between getting the commission…or not.

From what I have seen (and heard), I don’t think the importance of (tightly edited) “personal work” can be overstated. I know that one of the photographers from the agency (who started her photographic career at 37 and shoots mainly film- gives me hope!) gets a lot of work based on her personal portfolio…In fact each of the photographer’s has a “personal projects” section in their online portfolio.

Re editing: I always think it is so much easier to have someone else (on the same-ish wavelength of course) edit something than it is to do yourself. I guess this has something to do with the fact that the “editor” can be impartial,objective, ruthless, emotionless to some extent, because they don’t know what you went through to get the photograph ie lugging equipment, trekking in 35 degree heat all day without taking a single decent shot,getting chased by a pack of stray dogs etc – they only see the finished product. It is the same with correcting someone’s essay- easier to take the red pen to somebody’s work than your own.So even though it is excruiatingly hard to say “yep, here you go, here’s my portfolio- do your worst!” (and I don’t have the guts to do it- yet) I think it is easier than trying to do it yourself.

Sorry for banging on again (when I comment, I really like to comment a LOT, huh?!)……..So, once you, David and Gavin have culled, may I please have your “discards”…I think they would look mighty pretty in my portfolio ;);)

Ha Ha- I have just looked at the length of my post compared to everyone else’s- someone needs to red pen me!!

Vanessa, BTW DO you go by Neddy? You post was long but very well thought out and I think made a lot of since. I have always said, photographers make the worst editor of their own images.

Maybe I’ll cut and past your comment at a guest post

Vanessa, BTW DO you go by Neddy? You post was long but very well thought out and I think made a lot of since. I have always said, photographers make the worst editor of their own images.

Maybe I’ll cut and past your comment at a guest post

Yep, Ned, Neddy, Messy, Jacko, vj…the list goes on!